Following an article published in the Journal de Montreal accusing the provincial government lying to us: "We lie to Quebecers' , Mr. Bachand is really not happy .
The problem is that these people consider themselves above government critics.
The text of Mr. Doucet is pure opinion piece, supported by figures and without personal attacks. Whether you agree or disagree with his opinion does not change anything.
And what should we be if we do not agree, simply reply with another text, or shut up.
This is called a debate of opinion, but this is sound hacker voice of extinction in our times.
- 1. avoid at all costs directly address the points raised. Remain vague and even repeat the original message.
- 2. attack the messenger, his credibility, his "credentials". Do not respond to public opinion but rather to demonstrate that the opinion of the person can not be credible. Personal attack, an association with something that is perceived as evil, skeleton in the closet, personal training, all means are good.
- 3. Take indignantly, paternalistic. Like "you know, what we want is the good of all .... I wonder what motivates that person to do so, "I feel really sad for such attacks ...», etc. ...
- 4. Stopper the rest of the reply by talking about "duck rut" or any other non-compromising imbecility giving the impression to replicate without doing ....
- 5. Finish with the gag. Ie to make threats left and right, tracking, ethics committee, etc.. The goal is to give the impression that the argument (which does not even) is so false that it amounts to a slanderous attack ...
Bachand seems to have learned his lessons well: Bachand-cons attack
The budget is transparent, has served Mr. Bachand. "The figures are projections. We'll see where we fall. But if one falls to 58% or if it falls to 65%, it will tell you that is 58% or 65% (...) You will be able to track those figures (...) There is a Auditor General of Quebec, there are hundreds of specialists from all the houses that are looking at the numbers. Talk to them, "pleaded the Minister of Finance.
Item 1. It is not on this that was the text of Mr. Doucet.
Raymond Bachand has shown again outraged by the story published in our delivery on Monday, saying it was "based on a false analysis coming to false conclusions (...)».
"It's a story that brings shame to the profession of journalism," chided the finance minister went so far as to question the competence of the accounting ag reated Louis Charbonneau whose studies have been the source of reports signed by the Journal.
"The report is based on a person who gives the title of chartered accountant, which is incorrect according to my information. This person is a chartered accountant, as far as I know.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants has intervened, "said Mr. Bachand.
A spokesman of the Order of Chartered Accountants, Mr Jean-Philippe Payment, confirmed the order on its own initiative, conduct an audit regarding the professional qualifications of Mr. Charbonneau.
Le Journal de Montreal said that Mr. Charbonneau was a member of the Order of Chartered Accountants until his retirement in 1996.
Item 2: personal attack.
Item 2: personal attack.
Here we analyze false == false conclusions but not details on what is wrong.
Then we have this book (which is supposedly an imposter?). As if that changed anything to the argument. If Mr. Bachand want to discredit this book is all about with figures and arguments that it should.
And what about Accountant who has missed an opportunity to tell us it was just not one of those cases ... Need to listen to the numbers.
Raymond Bachand has again shown indignant ...
"It's a story that makes shame to the profession of journalism, "chided Minister of Finance ...
to complain about what he called "slippage" and claim "corrections" and "apology".
Point 3: The outrage at this affront.
Skid, shame on the profession of journalism? absolutely not ...
Quebec plans to provide 62% of the effort by compressing expenditures while Taxpayers will absorb 38% increases in taxes and tariffs, argued Raymond Bachand.
The budget is transparent, has served Mr. Bachand.
"The figures are projections. We'll see where we fall. But if one falls to 58% or if it falls to 65%, it will tell you that is 58% or 65% (...) You will be able to track those figures (...)
Item 4: bla bla bla, we repeated the message, taking care to avoid any issue raised the critically ...
Raymond Bachand said he wrote a "private letter" to Quebecor CEO Pierre Karl Peladeau to complain about what he called "slippage" and claim "corrections" and "excuses".
He also mentioned that the Ministry of Finance examines the recourse he may have. "The power of the press is important for democracy, but it is important that there be a standard of quality," he said.
Item 5: the gag, threats of retaliation ...
And it is here that Mr. Bachand shows us how it sees itself above criticism and how he is ready to crush the freedom expression for not debating.
"The power of the press is important for democracy, but it's important to have a quality standard"
is you who dictate the quality standards I guess Mr. Bachand?
Species of Chihuahua who thinks he is a dictator!
Francis.
0 comments:
Post a Comment